R has an amazing variety of functions for cluster analysis. In this section, I will describe three of the many approaches: hierarchical agglomerative, partitioning, and model based. While there are no best solutions for the problem of determining the number of clusters to extract, several approaches are given below.
Prior to clustering data, you may want to remove or estimate missing data and rescale variables for comparability.
# Prepare Data
mydata <- na.omit(mydata) # listwise deletion of missing
mydata <- scale(mydata) # standardize variables
K-means clustering is the most popular partitioning method. It requires the analyst to specify the number of clusters to extract. A plot of the within groups sum of squares by number of clusters extracted can help determine the appropriate number of clusters. The analyst looks for a bend in the plot similar to a scree test in factor analysis. See Everitt & Hothorn (pg. 251).
# Determine number of clusters
wss <- (nrow(mydata)-1)*sum(apply(mydata,2,var))
for (i in 2:15) wss[i] <- sum(kmeans(mydata,
plot(1:15, wss, type="b", xlab="Number of Clusters",
ylab="Within groups sum of squares")
# K-Means Cluster Analysis
fit <- kmeans(mydata, 5) # 5 cluster solution
# get cluster means
# append cluster assignment
mydata <- data.frame(mydata, fit$cluster)
A robust version of K-means based on mediods can be invoked by using pam( ) instead of kmeans( ). The function pamk( ) in the fpc package is a wrapper for pam that also prints the suggested number of clusters based on optimum average silhouette width.
There are a wide range of hierarchical clustering approaches. I have had good luck with Ward's method described below.
# Ward Hierarchical Clustering
d <- dist(mydata, method = "euclidean") # distance matrix
fit <- hclust(d, method="ward")
plot(fit) # display dendogram
groups <- cutree(fit, k=5) # cut tree into 5 clusters
# draw dendogram with red borders around the 5 clusters
rect.hclust(fit, k=5, border="red")
The pvclust( ) function in the pvclust package provides p-values for hierarchical clustering based on multiscale bootstrap resampling. Clusters that are highly supported by the data will have large p values. Interpretation details are provided Suzuki. Be aware that pvclust clusters columns, not rows. Transpose your data before using.
# Ward Hierarchical Clustering with Bootstrapped p values
fit <- pvclust(mydata, method.hclust="ward",
plot(fit) # dendogram with p values
# add rectangles around groups highly supported by the data
Model based approaches assume a variety of data models and apply maximum likelihood estimation and Bayes criteria to identify the most likely model and number of clusters. Specifically, the Mclust( ) function in the mclust package selects the optimal model according to BIC for EM initialized by hierarchical clustering for parameterized Gaussian mixture models. (phew!). One chooses the model and number of clusters with the largest BIC. See help(mclustModelNames) to details on the model chosen as best.
# Model Based Clustering
fit <- Mclust(mydata)
plot(fit, mydata) # plot results
print(fit) # display the best model
Plotting Cluster Solutions
It is always a good idea to look at the cluster results.
# K-Means Clustering with 5 clusters
fit <- kmeans(mydata, 5)
# Cluster Plot against 1st 2 principal components
# vary parameters for most readable graph
clusplot(mydata, fit$cluster, color=TRUE, shade=TRUE,
# Centroid Plot against 1st 2 discriminant functions
Validating cluster solutions
The function cluster.stats() in the fpc package provides a mechanism for comparing the similarity of two cluster solutions using a variety of validation criteria (Hubert's gamma coefficient, the Dunn index and the corrected rand index)
# comparing 2 cluster solutions
cluster.stats(d, fit1$cluster, fit2$cluster)
where d is a distance matrix among objects, and fit1$cluster and fit$cluster are integer vectors containing classification results from two different clusterings of the same data.